Well the day has finally arrived. Our Open Day at the Freeranger farm to show how a real free range farm operates. Low stocking densities, plenty of space for the hens, unlimited access to pasture, the hens are never locked up, only natural grains are fed with no meat meal or colouring additives etc. etc......
Hopefully we will be able to get the message across to consumers that there are plenty of eggs out there labelled as free range which don't meet expected standards or labelling requirements.
Sunday, October 13, 2013
Tuesday, October 08, 2013
Freeranger on ABC Radio
ABC Gippsland reporter Jenni Henderson came to the farm last week to record an interview about our farm Open Day this Sunday. She did an excellent job and the interview was broadcast on various ABC radio stations this morning. It may well be on Country Hour throughout Victoria at midday.
Details:
http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2013/10/05/3863085.htm
Details:
http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2013/10/05/3863085.htm
Labels:
ABC Radio,
Freeranger Eggs Open Day,
World Egg Day
Friday, October 04, 2013
Woolworths to ban cage eggs from its shelves
The supermarket giant Woolworths is set to announce that it will phase out the sale of cage eggs in its stores by 2018. It seems like a draconian step that will send shock waves through the industry.
Surely consumers should have a choice - as long as the eggs are labelled honestly? If the egg farms meet the provisions of the Model Code they should be able to sell the eggs to anyone who is prepared to buy them. Apparently that won't be Woolworths.
One of the Woolworths' brands, Macro uses a maximum chicken stocking density of 1500 birds per hectare but Woolworths’ Select free-range eggs has a stocking rate of 10,000 per hectare - that is a consumer con.
This just makes it more obvious that there has to be a legal national definition of the term 'free range'. Leaving it up to the industry and a couple of grocers doesn't treat consumers fairly.
Details from The Age:
http://www.theage.com.au/national/woolworths-to-phase-out-all-battery-hen-eggs-20131003-2uxhf.html
Surely consumers should have a choice - as long as the eggs are labelled honestly? If the egg farms meet the provisions of the Model Code they should be able to sell the eggs to anyone who is prepared to buy them. Apparently that won't be Woolworths.
One of the Woolworths' brands, Macro uses a maximum chicken stocking density of 1500 birds per hectare but Woolworths’ Select free-range eggs has a stocking rate of 10,000 per hectare - that is a consumer con.
This just makes it more obvious that there has to be a legal national definition of the term 'free range'. Leaving it up to the industry and a couple of grocers doesn't treat consumers fairly.
Details from The Age:
http://www.theage.com.au/national/woolworths-to-phase-out-all-battery-hen-eggs-20131003-2uxhf.html
Wednesday, October 02, 2013
Coles' standard encourages 'Mickey Mouse' egg farms
Who would have thought that
New South Wales cage egg industry heavyweight, Bede Burke from
Tamworth, would join the fight against high density 'free range'
production.
He is on record as saying that the Coles' drive for more free range eggs 'is an animal welfare disaster in the making.'
Mr Burke told the Tamworth City Times that profitability on free range farms was being driven down and they would become intensive open-air factories. He said it was already happening as Coles demanded more eggs from suppliers.
“It looks all nice and populist for the consumer, but in reality it is encouraging cowboy operations. Coles demand for free range eggs is encouraging Mickey Mouse operations run with too many birds in bad facilities.”
“As a result, egg quality, freshness and food safety standards are being and will be compromised,” he added.
Good on Mr Burke for saying it like it is.
Bede Burke is Chair of the NSW Farmers Association Egg Group
He is on record as saying that the Coles' drive for more free range eggs 'is an animal welfare disaster in the making.'
Mr Burke told the Tamworth City Times that profitability on free range farms was being driven down and they would become intensive open-air factories. He said it was already happening as Coles demanded more eggs from suppliers.
“It looks all nice and populist for the consumer, but in reality it is encouraging cowboy operations. Coles demand for free range eggs is encouraging Mickey Mouse operations run with too many birds in bad facilities.”
We
couldn't agree more with Mr Burke. That is exactly what Coles and
the Australian Egg Corporation have done.
“As a result, egg quality, freshness and food safety standards are being and will be compromised,” he added.
Good on Mr Burke for saying it like it is.
Bede Burke is Chair of the NSW Farmers Association Egg Group
Labels:
Bede Burke,
Coles,
free range con,
NSW Farmers Association
Tuesday, October 01, 2013
Free Range Super Complaint
The Sydney Morning Herald and other Fairfax media outlets have run a story today about the consumer group CHOICE lodging a Super Complaint with Fair Trading in NSW about the egg industry and the definition of 'free range'.
Politicians can't keep ignoring the problem. Sooner or later they will have to climb out of the pockets of the big industry players and show some leadership.
Read the full story by Sarah Whyte here:
http://www.smh.com.au/national/buyers-misled-on-freerange-eggs-20130930-2uou2.html
Politicians can't keep ignoring the problem. Sooner or later they will have to climb out of the pockets of the big industry players and show some leadership.
Read the full story by Sarah Whyte here:
http://www.smh.com.au/national/buyers-misled-on-freerange-eggs-20130930-2uou2.html
Labels:
CHOICE,
free range con,
free range definition,
free range eggs
Wednesday, September 25, 2013
Freeranger Open Day
Rather than print hundreds of pages for visitors to take away on our Open Day on Sunday October 13, all Fact Sheets are available on our website as downloadable PDF's
They can be accessed at: http://www.freeranger.com.au/fact-sheet-downloads.html
This is in keeping with the farm's environmental policy to limit unnecessary waste. We haven't quite achieved a paperless office - but we are getting pretty close.
The Open Day is designed to celebrate World Egg Day and showcase free range egg farming.
They can be accessed at: http://www.freeranger.com.au/fact-sheet-downloads.html
This is in keeping with the farm's environmental policy to limit unnecessary waste. We haven't quite achieved a paperless office - but we are getting pretty close.
The Open Day is designed to celebrate World Egg Day and showcase free range egg farming.
Monday, September 23, 2013
Free Range Farmers nonsense
It's often hard to understand where people are coming from. It
seems that the faceless individuals currently running the Free Range
Farmers Association don't like some of the things I have been
saying.
Well tough!!
I have stated very openly that I and the farm operated with Anne are no longer members of FRFA because the committee refused to uphold the standards of the Association.
In press coverage I do not claim to represent FRFA or the national association. I tell journalists that I am the immediate Past President of the national body.
What more can I do? I can't help it if the reporters want to obtain factual information from me rather than mindless nonsense from the newly appointed FRFA President or Secretary.
There is nothing on the FRFA website to show members (or anyone else) who are on the committee. But from aggressive and negative letters which have been sent out, it seems that Dianne Moore is currently the President, and Jessica Luketic is the secreatary. WHY HAVEN'T MEMBERS BEEN INFORMED?
Well tough!!
I have stated very openly that I and the farm operated with Anne are no longer members of FRFA because the committee refused to uphold the standards of the Association.
In press coverage I do not claim to represent FRFA or the national association. I tell journalists that I am the immediate Past President of the national body.
What more can I do? I can't help it if the reporters want to obtain factual information from me rather than mindless nonsense from the newly appointed FRFA President or Secretary.
There is nothing on the FRFA website to show members (or anyone else) who are on the committee. But from aggressive and negative letters which have been sent out, it seems that Dianne Moore is currently the President, and Jessica Luketic is the secreatary. WHY HAVEN'T MEMBERS BEEN INFORMED?
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
Hopes run high for ACCC action on egg industry
ABC Radio in Victoria ran this today in its rural news programmes. It was a follow up piece to the news that the ACCC has asked for major egg farms to supply details of their trading actions which may have been anti-competetive.
Monday, September 02, 2013
RSPCA accreditation is questioned
It is surprising that the RSPCA has an accreditation program which it appears may not meet consumer expectations.
Have a look at video footage on http://freerangefraud.com/free-range-fraud/ and see for yourself why consumer faith has been shaken yet again in accreditation systems. Why should consumers trust any labels! This is only the latest in a line of revelations which indicate that accreditation standards are less than adequate. However, RSPCA says that it has visited the farm in question since it viewed the footage and saw nothing like the scenes depicted in the video.
Freeranger Eggs is no longer a member of, or accredited by, the Free Range Farmers Association Inc. because the last committee of that Association did not enforce its own standards. We are also no longer accredited by Humane Choice.
Have a look at video footage on http://freerangefraud.com/free-range-fraud/ and see for yourself why consumer faith has been shaken yet again in accreditation systems. Why should consumers trust any labels! This is only the latest in a line of revelations which indicate that accreditation standards are less than adequate. However, RSPCA says that it has visited the farm in question since it viewed the footage and saw nothing like the scenes depicted in the video.
Freeranger Eggs is no longer a member of, or accredited by, the Free Range Farmers Association Inc. because the last committee of that Association did not enforce its own standards. We are also no longer accredited by Humane Choice.
Backlash against Queensland decision on stocking densities
There has been quite a public backlash to the Queensland Government decision to cave in to pressure from big business and the Australian Egg Corporation and allow an increase in stocking densities on free range egg farms.
For 10 years, Queensland has been the only State in Australia with regulations limiting stocking densities to 1500 hens per hectare - in line with the Model Code. The industry there has coped very sucessfully so it is rather bizare that at a time when the Model Code is under review that the Government suddenly made a unilateral decision and took a backward step.
Here are some details from the Weekly Times.
http://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/article/2013/09/01/581464_business-news.html
For 10 years, Queensland has been the only State in Australia with regulations limiting stocking densities to 1500 hens per hectare - in line with the Model Code. The industry there has coped very sucessfully so it is rather bizare that at a time when the Model Code is under review that the Government suddenly made a unilateral decision and took a backward step.
Here are some details from the Weekly Times.
http://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/article/2013/09/01/581464_business-news.html
Saturday, August 31, 2013
Open Day to celebrate World Egg Day
We will be able to demonstrate how a genuine free range farm operates with low stocking densities; without the need for feeding pellets containing meat meal and colouring additives; without beak trimming the hens and without having to lock our chooks up - even at night.
The Open Day is in addition to workshops on starting a free range egg farm which are run throughout the year on the Grantville property. The last one was as part of Fair Food Week a couple of weeks ago. (We will probably run another workshop in November but we haven't set a date yet).
We will get information kits together for visitors to the farm Open Day to take away with them.
The first World Egg Day, organised by the International Egg Commission was celebrated in 1996.
Much more info later.
http://thinkegg.com/index.php/world-egg-day/?lang=en
Labels:
free range eggs,
Freeranger Eggs,
Open Day,
World Egg Day
Friday, August 23, 2013
What does 'free range' mean?
Freeranger Eggs is currently not involved with any industry
accreditation body other than the Victorian Farmers Markets'
Association. We are registered as a free range egg farm with our
Council, Bass Coast Shire and with the Department of Environment and
Primary Industries.
Until June 30 this year, we were members of (and accredited by) the Free Range Farmers Association. But we chose not to renew our membership as the association failed to uphold and maintain its own standards and had failed to conduct farm inspections during the year (which is about the only significant cost to the Association and is the only benefit for members).
We also had a partnered accreditation agreement with Humane Choice. But with the actions of the committee of the Free Range Farmers Association in destroying the credibility of FRFA, that agreement has lapsed even though it was set to run until next November. Verna Simpson, the CEO of the Humane Society International which operates the Humane Choice program has sent us this invitation:"As FRFA does not seem to be continuing as a certification body you are welcome to become a full HC farm. Your farm is what free range farming is all about and you would obviously have no trouble meeting our audit requirements. It is just a shame that FRFA’s internal issues could not be resolved."
The problem erupted over the re-accreditation by the FRFA committee of a farm which breached the Association's standards by packaging eggs from non-accredited sources (egg substitution) and not taking action against farms which used pelleted feed containing colouring additives. The use of manufactured colouring additives was specifically banned by the FRFA standards.
As things stand, there is no accreditation body in Australia which meets the standards we have maintained on the Freeranger Eggs farm.
Some of the egg accreditation organisations are formally recognised by Governments – but some are not.
Here's brief view of the accreditation systems currently around in Victoria.
Egg Corp Assured – Allows beak trimming and unlimited stocking densities in sheds or range areas – The Australian Egg Corporation has acknowledged that some 'free range' farms run 40,000 hens per hectare or more. It also has no restrictions on the inclusion of meat meal or colouring additives in feed.
RSPCA - Not interested in accrediting small producers as they have a royalty system in place which provides an income stream for them per dozen eggs sold and they want volume producers. Allows beak trimming and outdoor stocking densities of up to 2500 hens per hectare. It seems there are no restrictions on feed or colouring additives. Apparently there are only two RSPCA accredited free range egg farms throughout Australia.
Humane Choice – Does not allow beak trimming. Maximum stocking density of 1500 hens per hectare. Allows colouring additives. Does not allow the use of same species in meat meal used in hen rations.
Free Range Egg and Poultry Australia Ltd – Allows beak trimming. Stocking densities appear to be variable. No restrictions on feed.
Free Range Farmers Association – Does not allow beak trimming. Limits stocking density to 750 hens per hectare (but committee members have said they want to increase the numbers to 1500). Now allows manufactured colouring additives in the feed ration. Allows meat meal in the feed (which may be derived from poultry).
Organic certification - This is probably the closest to the standards we have at Freeranger Eggs. But at least one of the certification bodies (NASAA) allows manufactured colouring additives in the chook food.
Is it any wonder that the industry is in turmoil and that consumers are confused? Happy to hear your comments.
Until June 30 this year, we were members of (and accredited by) the Free Range Farmers Association. But we chose not to renew our membership as the association failed to uphold and maintain its own standards and had failed to conduct farm inspections during the year (which is about the only significant cost to the Association and is the only benefit for members).
We also had a partnered accreditation agreement with Humane Choice. But with the actions of the committee of the Free Range Farmers Association in destroying the credibility of FRFA, that agreement has lapsed even though it was set to run until next November. Verna Simpson, the CEO of the Humane Society International which operates the Humane Choice program has sent us this invitation:"As FRFA does not seem to be continuing as a certification body you are welcome to become a full HC farm. Your farm is what free range farming is all about and you would obviously have no trouble meeting our audit requirements. It is just a shame that FRFA’s internal issues could not be resolved."
The problem erupted over the re-accreditation by the FRFA committee of a farm which breached the Association's standards by packaging eggs from non-accredited sources (egg substitution) and not taking action against farms which used pelleted feed containing colouring additives. The use of manufactured colouring additives was specifically banned by the FRFA standards.
As things stand, there is no accreditation body in Australia which meets the standards we have maintained on the Freeranger Eggs farm.
Some of the egg accreditation organisations are formally recognised by Governments – but some are not.
Here's brief view of the accreditation systems currently around in Victoria.
Egg Corp Assured – Allows beak trimming and unlimited stocking densities in sheds or range areas – The Australian Egg Corporation has acknowledged that some 'free range' farms run 40,000 hens per hectare or more. It also has no restrictions on the inclusion of meat meal or colouring additives in feed.
RSPCA - Not interested in accrediting small producers as they have a royalty system in place which provides an income stream for them per dozen eggs sold and they want volume producers. Allows beak trimming and outdoor stocking densities of up to 2500 hens per hectare. It seems there are no restrictions on feed or colouring additives. Apparently there are only two RSPCA accredited free range egg farms throughout Australia.
Humane Choice – Does not allow beak trimming. Maximum stocking density of 1500 hens per hectare. Allows colouring additives. Does not allow the use of same species in meat meal used in hen rations.
Free Range Egg and Poultry Australia Ltd – Allows beak trimming. Stocking densities appear to be variable. No restrictions on feed.
Free Range Farmers Association – Does not allow beak trimming. Limits stocking density to 750 hens per hectare (but committee members have said they want to increase the numbers to 1500). Now allows manufactured colouring additives in the feed ration. Allows meat meal in the feed (which may be derived from poultry).
Organic certification - This is probably the closest to the standards we have at Freeranger Eggs. But at least one of the certification bodies (NASAA) allows manufactured colouring additives in the chook food.
Is it any wonder that the industry is in turmoil and that consumers are confused? Happy to hear your comments.
Sunday, August 18, 2013
How 'free range' are the eggs consumers buy?
Problems in the New Zealand egg industry appear to be exactly the same as the issues free range egg farmers have here in Australia.
Here's a clear report about what is going on there:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/food-wine/food-news/9055738/How-free-range-are-your-eggs
Here's a clear report about what is going on there:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/food-wine/food-news/9055738/How-free-range-are-your-eggs
Friday, August 16, 2013
Controlling aggression in chickens without beak trimming
Beak trimming of laying hens is still a widespread practice in
Australia – even in 'free range' flocks of birds. The majority of
so-called free range farms are intensive production systems with
flocks of many thousands of hens.
Even the Model Code of Practice for the Welfare of Animals - Domestic Poultry, which provides the only widely accepted national definition of the term 'free range' states that every effort should be made to avoid beak trimming by selecting birds which have more docile tendencies.
But the reality is that intensive free range farms beak trim their birds as a matter of course because they want to run large numbers and they chose to use high producing hens developed for the cage industry. These hens have been selectively cross bred for only two traits – maximum egg production and minimum feed intake. This often means they are aggressive and cannibalistic.
It is important to select a strain of bird that is less aggressive, and to get breeders to breed birds that are more docile. Research has shown that breeding for low aggression can have a marked effect in only 4 or 5 generations. Dr Mike Gentle, a U.S. researcher in this area, has concluded:
" In the long term, beak trimming should be phased out and undesirable behaviour controlled by environmental means and by increased effort being devoted to the genetic selection of commercial stocks which do not engage in damaging pecking, either in cages or when floor-housed in large flocks. "
In our view, hens should be kept in groups small enough to be able to recognise each other. At Freeranger Eggs we run maximum flock sizes of 250 – 300 birds.
Hens need to express their natural behaviour, including the strong urge to peck. They must have material in which to forage and dust bathe.
Good husbandry is a major factor in reducing aggression, especially preventing conditions that cause frustration in hens. They must also have an adequate and well-balanced diet, easy access to food and water, enough space, and minimum disturbance.
Egg farmers need to make a much greater effort to control aggression without beak trimming. From our experience talking with consumers at Farmers' Markets, they do not believe that 'free range' production should involve the beak trimming of birds. Aggression and cannibalism is a behavioural problem which is easily solved by effective poultry management and selection of birds.
Even the Model Code of Practice for the Welfare of Animals - Domestic Poultry, which provides the only widely accepted national definition of the term 'free range' states that every effort should be made to avoid beak trimming by selecting birds which have more docile tendencies.
But the reality is that intensive free range farms beak trim their birds as a matter of course because they want to run large numbers and they chose to use high producing hens developed for the cage industry. These hens have been selectively cross bred for only two traits – maximum egg production and minimum feed intake. This often means they are aggressive and cannibalistic.
It is important to select a strain of bird that is less aggressive, and to get breeders to breed birds that are more docile. Research has shown that breeding for low aggression can have a marked effect in only 4 or 5 generations. Dr Mike Gentle, a U.S. researcher in this area, has concluded:
" In the long term, beak trimming should be phased out and undesirable behaviour controlled by environmental means and by increased effort being devoted to the genetic selection of commercial stocks which do not engage in damaging pecking, either in cages or when floor-housed in large flocks. "
In our view, hens should be kept in groups small enough to be able to recognise each other. At Freeranger Eggs we run maximum flock sizes of 250 – 300 birds.
Hens need to express their natural behaviour, including the strong urge to peck. They must have material in which to forage and dust bathe.
Good husbandry is a major factor in reducing aggression, especially preventing conditions that cause frustration in hens. They must also have an adequate and well-balanced diet, easy access to food and water, enough space, and minimum disturbance.
Egg farmers need to make a much greater effort to control aggression without beak trimming. From our experience talking with consumers at Farmers' Markets, they do not believe that 'free range' production should involve the beak trimming of birds. Aggression and cannibalism is a behavioural problem which is easily solved by effective poultry management and selection of birds.
Thursday, August 15, 2013
Egg labelling is a shambles in Australia
Egg labelling laws and accreditation processes are a shambles in
Australia because there is no legally recognised national definition of the term 'free range'. The Queensland Government has relaxed its regulation
limiting stocking densities to 1500 hens per hectare on free range
farms to 10,000 per hectare.
The NSW Government seems set to reject a Truth in Labelling Bill which has passed the Upper House and the SA Government is introducing a 'voluntary' code for the industry in that State.
Egg substitution has been rife for years but probably first came to general notice in Victoria during 2007 with a high profile case when a company was fined for labelling eggs as organic when they were from conventional farms.
In 2012, a NSW barn egg farm was fined for packaging its eggs as free range and a South Australian egg seller was fined for putting cage eggs in free range cartons.
Also in 2012. An egg farm in WA was caught with a huge overstocking rate which breached its planning conditions. This farm was accredited by a national egg quality scheme but despite annual audits which required compliance with planning conditions the farm remained accredited. The accreditation was only withdrawn once the breaches became public and legal proceedings began.
In Victoria in 2012 inspection and audit processes revealed that a farm was packing and selling non-accredited eggs from dubious sources and that colouring additives were being used in poultry feed – breaching particular standards.
Labels can also be misleading, with pictures of hens frolicking on green pasture, which frequently don't resemble conditions on the farm.
A questionable 'organic' accreditation body also exists in Victoria which is not recognised by mainstream organic bodies and which does not have a credible inspection process – but claims that the products which its members sell are certified organic. AQIS, which registers organic certification bodies in Australia, is apparently only involved with export industries – so it has no jurisdiction over domestic 'organic' claims.
Accreditation means different things to different people. Consumers rightly expect it to convey a message of credibility about a particular product, but to many businesses it's simply a marketing tool designed to allow them to make claims which increase their profits.
Similarly, a logo can be a valuable asset if it is trusted by consumers. But it's value can be destroyed if it is shown to be meaningless. Any accreditation program is only as good as the willingness of the accreditation body to maintain its standards and defend its logo.
That is why it is so disappointing that standards are ignored by accreditation bodies. Even using things like egg yolk colourings should be disclosed to consumers. Everyone expects cage farms to use them to enhance yolk colour but it is neither needed nor necessary on a genuine free range farm with low stocking densities and plenty of green feed.
To maintain ethical standards and credibility, all certification bodies need to defend their standards and take action against suppliers who break the rules.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has asked many egg producers to justify the claims made on their packaging – claims such as 'free range'.
Hopefully this will start a 'clean-up' process.
The NSW Government seems set to reject a Truth in Labelling Bill which has passed the Upper House and the SA Government is introducing a 'voluntary' code for the industry in that State.
Egg substitution has been rife for years but probably first came to general notice in Victoria during 2007 with a high profile case when a company was fined for labelling eggs as organic when they were from conventional farms.
In 2012, a NSW barn egg farm was fined for packaging its eggs as free range and a South Australian egg seller was fined for putting cage eggs in free range cartons.
Also in 2012. An egg farm in WA was caught with a huge overstocking rate which breached its planning conditions. This farm was accredited by a national egg quality scheme but despite annual audits which required compliance with planning conditions the farm remained accredited. The accreditation was only withdrawn once the breaches became public and legal proceedings began.
In Victoria in 2012 inspection and audit processes revealed that a farm was packing and selling non-accredited eggs from dubious sources and that colouring additives were being used in poultry feed – breaching particular standards.
Labels can also be misleading, with pictures of hens frolicking on green pasture, which frequently don't resemble conditions on the farm.
A questionable 'organic' accreditation body also exists in Victoria which is not recognised by mainstream organic bodies and which does not have a credible inspection process – but claims that the products which its members sell are certified organic. AQIS, which registers organic certification bodies in Australia, is apparently only involved with export industries – so it has no jurisdiction over domestic 'organic' claims.
Accreditation means different things to different people. Consumers rightly expect it to convey a message of credibility about a particular product, but to many businesses it's simply a marketing tool designed to allow them to make claims which increase their profits.
Similarly, a logo can be a valuable asset if it is trusted by consumers. But it's value can be destroyed if it is shown to be meaningless. Any accreditation program is only as good as the willingness of the accreditation body to maintain its standards and defend its logo.
That is why it is so disappointing that standards are ignored by accreditation bodies. Even using things like egg yolk colourings should be disclosed to consumers. Everyone expects cage farms to use them to enhance yolk colour but it is neither needed nor necessary on a genuine free range farm with low stocking densities and plenty of green feed.
To maintain ethical standards and credibility, all certification bodies need to defend their standards and take action against suppliers who break the rules.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has asked many egg producers to justify the claims made on their packaging – claims such as 'free range'.
Hopefully this will start a 'clean-up' process.
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
Bird Flu research - report from UK
Researchers from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine say that a limited cross infection of bird flu from human to human is not surprising.
They say that in China the majority of the 133 confirmed cases reported so far seem to be epidemiologically unconnected, with many patients reporting a recent history of exposure to live poultry, which are suspected to be a main reservoir for the virus. Although an earlier study did report two family clusters of H7N9 cases, it was unclear whether these clusters resulted from person to person transmission or simply from exposure to a common animal source of infection.
The researchers say that although the study, led by the Jiangsu Province Center for Disease Control and Prevention, provides the strongest evidence yet of H7N9 transmission between humans, it probably does not mean that the virus has come one step closer towards adapting fully to humans.
The full report in the British Medical Journal is here:
http://www.bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f4730
They say that in China the majority of the 133 confirmed cases reported so far seem to be epidemiologically unconnected, with many patients reporting a recent history of exposure to live poultry, which are suspected to be a main reservoir for the virus. Although an earlier study did report two family clusters of H7N9 cases, it was unclear whether these clusters resulted from person to person transmission or simply from exposure to a common animal source of infection.
The researchers say that although the study, led by the Jiangsu Province Center for Disease Control and Prevention, provides the strongest evidence yet of H7N9 transmission between humans, it probably does not mean that the virus has come one step closer towards adapting fully to humans.
The full report in the British Medical Journal is here:
http://www.bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f4730
Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Queensland decision ridiculed
This was published today in the Canberra Times and the Brisbane Times and perhaps other newspapers across the country. It is a comment piece written by John Birmingham and it paints an accurate picture of the Queensland Government decision to cave in to big business.
It’s hard to imagine anyone getting excited over the prospect of squeezing 10,000 chickens into something like a suburban block.
But the local minister for chickens, John McVeigh, seems very excited indeed at the prospect. As no doubt are the giant egg producers who’ve been lobbying for years redefine ‘free range’ eggs as ‘free to make enormous sodding profits from a lot of gullible punters and even grumpier chickens’.
If the industry could only sell millions more tasteless pale little yellow eggs from sad old cluckers imprisoned in closely packed sheds for the same price those free range hippies are selling their bloated inconveniently tasty golden eggs of goodness, why, the giant industrial farming companies which make up most of membership of the Australian Egg Corporation Limited would make a lot more money.
You can see why a state government with close ties to an industrial agribusiness like factory-scale egg producers would want to give them a free ticket to cash in on people’s desire for a half decent goog into which to dip their Vegemite toast soldiers. But I can’t see why we’d let them get away with it. This is such a blatant shakedown.
For some people, including most genuine free range farmers, it’s a matter of ethics, of not treating the chooks poorly. But even if you don’t much care about that, you should totally care that these bastards are trying to sell you a vastly inferior product at a grotesque mark up simply because their mates in the government have tipped them the nod to get away with it.
It’s hard to imagine anyone getting excited over the prospect of squeezing 10,000 chickens into something like a suburban block.
But the local minister for chickens, John McVeigh, seems very excited indeed at the prospect. As no doubt are the giant egg producers who’ve been lobbying for years redefine ‘free range’ eggs as ‘free to make enormous sodding profits from a lot of gullible punters and even grumpier chickens’.
If the industry could only sell millions more tasteless pale little yellow eggs from sad old cluckers imprisoned in closely packed sheds for the same price those free range hippies are selling their bloated inconveniently tasty golden eggs of goodness, why, the giant industrial farming companies which make up most of membership of the Australian Egg Corporation Limited would make a lot more money.
You can see why a state government with close ties to an industrial agribusiness like factory-scale egg producers would want to give them a free ticket to cash in on people’s desire for a half decent goog into which to dip their Vegemite toast soldiers. But I can’t see why we’d let them get away with it. This is such a blatant shakedown.
For some people, including most genuine free range farmers, it’s a matter of ethics, of not treating the chooks poorly. But even if you don’t much care about that, you should totally care that these bastards are trying to sell you a vastly inferior product at a grotesque mark up simply because their mates in the government have tipped them the nod to get away with it.
Friday, July 26, 2013
Queensland stocking density decision is pathetic
The Queensland Government's decision to amend the Animal Care and Protection Regulation
2012 to allow and allow greater stocking densities for free range layer hens is a complete cave-in to Coles supermarket and corporate egg preoducers.
They've done OK for the past ten years or so and there are plenty of free range egg farms across Australia operating very successfully with maximum stocking rates under 1500 hens per hectare.
The consumer group Choice has a petition running aimed at getting the Queensland Government to revert to its previous regulation.
http://choice.good.do/save-free-range-in-qld/email-queensland-s-premier-and-minister-for-agriculture-fisheries-and-forestry/
The regulation previously
limited stocking density to 1,500 birds per hectare a step taken some years ago to enforce a major provision of the Model Code. It argues that other states allow
higher densities and this placed
Queensland egg farmers at a disadvantage.
They've done OK for the past ten years or so and there are plenty of free range egg farms across Australia operating very successfully with maximum stocking rates under 1500 hens per hectare.
The consumer group Choice has a petition running aimed at getting the Queensland Government to revert to its previous regulation.
http://choice.good.do/save-free-range-in-qld/email-queensland-s-premier-and-minister-for-agriculture-fisheries-and-forestry/
Labels:
free range con,
free range eggs,
stocking density
Tuesday, July 16, 2013
Chicken challenge
From the WeeklyTimes:
PETA has written a letter to an egg producer offering to give charity up to $3400 if he confines himself to cage.The animal welfare group’s proposal has been made to egg producer Andrew Postregna who owns Tamarix Egg Farm in Dandenong South and states that PETA will donate $100 per hour to charity if Mr Postregna confines himself to a cage of similar proportions to his body, as the chickens' cages are to theirs for 34 hours, the time it takes a chicken to produce an egg.
PETA's Australia campaigns director Jason Baker said the group made the proposal to Mr Postregna after a statement he made on the Australian Egg Corporation Limited website.
Mr Baker said that Mr Postregna wrote on the website: "When there's a few birds in a cage they tend to know each other. They're happy. Their stress levels seem to be a lot less than what it is in free-range [chickens]".
Mr Baker said maybe after Mr Postregna gets a real feel for being caged, he'll stop claiming that caged hens are "happy".
Mr Postregna had not received any letter from PETA when the Weekly Times Now contacted him.
PETA's campaign co-ordinator Claire Fryer said the letter had been faxed and posted.
She said it was the first time PETA had made such a proposal.
PETA has written a letter to an egg producer offering to give charity up to $3400 if he confines himself to cage.The animal welfare group’s proposal has been made to egg producer Andrew Postregna who owns Tamarix Egg Farm in Dandenong South and states that PETA will donate $100 per hour to charity if Mr Postregna confines himself to a cage of similar proportions to his body, as the chickens' cages are to theirs for 34 hours, the time it takes a chicken to produce an egg.
PETA's Australia campaigns director Jason Baker said the group made the proposal to Mr Postregna after a statement he made on the Australian Egg Corporation Limited website.
Mr Baker said that Mr Postregna wrote on the website: "When there's a few birds in a cage they tend to know each other. They're happy. Their stress levels seem to be a lot less than what it is in free-range [chickens]".
Mr Baker said maybe after Mr Postregna gets a real feel for being caged, he'll stop claiming that caged hens are "happy".
Mr Postregna had not received any letter from PETA when the Weekly Times Now contacted him.
PETA's campaign co-ordinator Claire Fryer said the letter had been faxed and posted.
She said it was the first time PETA had made such a proposal.
Wednesday, July 03, 2013
Environmental Management on egg farms
Environmental Management Systems have
become essential tools for maintaining the sustainability of farms and
other rural enterprises. Many egg producers have already implemented
full EMS procedures on their farms.
An EMS is a flexible business management system that helps farmers develop their own strategies for integrating environmental considerations into the daily operations of a farm. An EMS builds on existing management strategies, such as emergency, pest, or nutrient management plans.
An EMS is a flexible business management system that helps farmers develop their own strategies for integrating environmental considerations into the daily operations of a farm. An EMS builds on existing management strategies, such as emergency, pest, or nutrient management plans.
It can be critical in improving
environmental performance, reducing livestock health risks, assisting
with regulatory compliance and improving the farm's reputation and
community relationships.
An initial part of the EMS process is
to clarify the farm environmental policy — how the farm identifies
and addresses environmental concerns. Once an environmental policy is
in place it helps to influence the development of a management system for on-farm activities. The
policy guides the business through planning, implementing and
reviewing farm management decisions that affect the environment, as well as the bottom line.
It allows for improved farm
management and continual improvement of an operation.
Contact us if you want more info or help in developing an EMS for your farm.
Contact us if you want more info or help in developing an EMS for your farm.
Thursday, June 27, 2013
Fly larvae could bring down the cost of poultry feed
A South African company,
AgriProtein Technologies has developed a manufacturing process to
produce fly larvae for use in poultry feed and other animal diets.
The company is using slaughterhouse waste, animal manure and
discarded food to grow the larvae, which are dried and ground into a
powdered ingredient for monogastric animal feeds. AgriProtein says
the product has a nutritional composition that is as good as fishmeal
and better than soy - an increasingly expensive component of poultry
feed.
Here at Freeranger Eggs, we have seen chooks eager to eat fly larvae whenever they come across them so we have no doubt that they could become a great food source.
The cost of feed has been a big issue for egg farmers, especially with the escalating cost of soya. Professor Louise Fresco of the University of Amsterdam told delegates at the International Egg Commission conference in Madrid in April, “There is a fantastic source of protein that we are not using and that is insects, insects in all kinds of forms.”
Production by AgriProtein
Technologies is relatively small scale at the moment. The company is
currently producing two tonnes of larvae protein a week in its plant
near Cape Town in South Africa, but is gearing up manufacturing
capacity with the creation of two full scale production plants in
Cape Town and Germany.
“We are passionate about expanding our business to recycle more waste nutrients and supply a natural protein to feed farm animals,” said Jason Drew of AgriProtein. The company recently won a $100,000 Innovation Prize for Africa (IPA), an award that was established by the African Innovation Foundation and the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa to encourage innovative achievements that contribute towards developing new products, increasing efficiency or saving cost.
The company says that larvae are a natural food of chickens in the wild and fish in streams. “Their nutritional composition is as good as that of fishmeal and better than soya. As a natural food it has excellent take on and digestibility properties,” says the company. “The most impressive part of the process is nature. A single female fly will lay 750 eggs in under a week, which will hatch into larvae which grow in weight over 400 times in just a few days. Our plant and machinery are modular in design, enabling plants to be built to suit each location. Each production line can produce up to ten tonnes of larvae protein per day.”
Jason Drew says the company, which is based in Stellenbosch, South Africa, has spent nearly six years working out how to get billions of egg-laying flies and larvae to work together. AgriProtein has had interest from nearly 30 countries wanting to license the process. And as well as setting up full-scale factories, the company has also developed a smaller unit for rural areas where small-scale animal owners can recycle their waste. Jason Drew said it was taken for granted that society should recycle tin, plastic and paper. Within 10 years it would be considered normal to recycle waste nutrients.
“We are passionate about expanding our business to recycle more waste nutrients and supply a natural protein to feed farm animals,” said Jason Drew of AgriProtein. The company recently won a $100,000 Innovation Prize for Africa (IPA), an award that was established by the African Innovation Foundation and the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa to encourage innovative achievements that contribute towards developing new products, increasing efficiency or saving cost.
The company says that larvae are a natural food of chickens in the wild and fish in streams. “Their nutritional composition is as good as that of fishmeal and better than soya. As a natural food it has excellent take on and digestibility properties,” says the company. “The most impressive part of the process is nature. A single female fly will lay 750 eggs in under a week, which will hatch into larvae which grow in weight over 400 times in just a few days. Our plant and machinery are modular in design, enabling plants to be built to suit each location. Each production line can produce up to ten tonnes of larvae protein per day.”
Jason Drew says the company, which is based in Stellenbosch, South Africa, has spent nearly six years working out how to get billions of egg-laying flies and larvae to work together. AgriProtein has had interest from nearly 30 countries wanting to license the process. And as well as setting up full-scale factories, the company has also developed a smaller unit for rural areas where small-scale animal owners can recycle their waste. Jason Drew said it was taken for granted that society should recycle tin, plastic and paper. Within 10 years it would be considered normal to recycle waste nutrients.
Here at Freeranger Eggs, we have seen chooks eager to eat fly larvae whenever they come across them so we have no doubt that they could become a great food source.
The cost of feed has been a big issue for egg farmers, especially with the escalating cost of soya. Professor Louise Fresco of the University of Amsterdam told delegates at the International Egg Commission conference in Madrid in April, “There is a fantastic source of protein that we are not using and that is insects, insects in all kinds of forms.”
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
New SA voluntary egg code
It's great that the South Australian Government is moving to establish a code for egg production in that State which will set a maximum stocking density of 1500 hens per hectare for the free range sector.
As it is proposed to be voluntary, it will really be just a marketing tool as other eggs from intensive farms will be able to be labelled as 'free range' as long as they don't claim to meet the new standard.
You can access details about the proposal at:
http://www.agd.sa.gov.au/sites/agd.sa.gov.au/files/documents/Initiatives%20Announcements%20and%20News/130612%20-%20Eggs%20Discussion%20paper.pdf
Comments are invited and close on July 12.
The comments we will be sending are:
and
http://ciwf.org.uk/includes/documents/cm_docs/2010/l/laying_hen_case_study_austria_ciwf.pdf
As it is proposed to be voluntary, it will really be just a marketing tool as other eggs from intensive farms will be able to be labelled as 'free range' as long as they don't claim to meet the new standard.
You can access details about the proposal at:
http://www.agd.sa.gov.au/sites/agd.sa.gov.au/files/documents/Initiatives%20Announcements%20and%20News/130612%20-%20Eggs%20Discussion%20paper.pdf
Comments are invited and close on July 12.
The comments we will be sending are:
The proposed standard for free range
egg production in South Australia is an excellent idea given the
absence of a Federal initiative to implement a national standard.
In our view the key points of the
production standard need to specify:
- A maximum outdoor stocking density of 1500 hens per hectare with an emphasis on maintaining ground cover for sustainable farm operations. This may require lower stocking rates when vegetative cover is depleted (such as during drought).
- Beak trimming of free range hens should be prohibited as it is not necessary with low stocking densities.
- Some limitation should be made on the number of hens in a shed as this can impact on whether or not the hens actually go outside. A maximum of 1000 or perhaps 2000 hens per shed at densities specified in the Model Code could be adopted.
- The hens must have full access to the outdoor area for at least eight hours every day
Discussion about beak trimming can be
found at:
and
http://ciwf.org.uk/includes/documents/cm_docs/2010/l/laying_hen_case_study_austria_ciwf.pdf
To provide consumer confidence in the
standards an auditing system will need to be introduced for
participating farms.
Labels:
egg code,
free range definition,
free range eggs
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Egg farms not exempt from climate change
There is little doubt
that climate change will cause serious supply chain disruptions over
the next few decades. And egg producers won't be exempt from the
problems. Despite persistent denials by climate change sceptics, the
connection between human behaviour and the warming of our planet has
been well established.
Carbon dioxide emissions between 1850 and 1950 amounted to an average of 2 billion tonnes per year. During the 1980s this rose to 7.1 billion and by 2020 it's estimated to reach 9.8 billion.
Freak weather events caused by these changes are triggering unexpected commodity shortages and price volatility as well at causing havoc with many farming operations. This creates unprecedented supply chain instability and introduces new levels of risk and uncertainty into markets.
Only those farm and other businesses that can adapt will survive. Stable supply chains in the future will depend on action being taken at multiple levels to reduce greenhouse gas emission and mitigate climate change.
Most businesses currently externalise the cost of natural resources, creating a distorted picture of financial performance and business value. It can be demonstrated that many of the ‘services’ provided by the environment and which are essential for long term viability, are not factored into mainstream financial reporting.
The pressure on business to correct this distortion through True Cost Accounting is growing—a system in which the monetary value of natural resources such as water, timber and fossil fuels are included as costs that are reflected in the bottom line.
If True Cost Accounting is accepted as a normal business tool, and businesses pay for their use of natural resources, market dynamics will drive businesses to reduce their dependency in order to survive.
Production at Freeranger Eggs is aimed at sustainability and we believe we are well placed to meet an uncertain future – although there are bound to be problems from time to time with feed shortages and cost increases.
Carbon dioxide emissions between 1850 and 1950 amounted to an average of 2 billion tonnes per year. During the 1980s this rose to 7.1 billion and by 2020 it's estimated to reach 9.8 billion.
Freak weather events caused by these changes are triggering unexpected commodity shortages and price volatility as well at causing havoc with many farming operations. This creates unprecedented supply chain instability and introduces new levels of risk and uncertainty into markets.
Only those farm and other businesses that can adapt will survive. Stable supply chains in the future will depend on action being taken at multiple levels to reduce greenhouse gas emission and mitigate climate change.
Most businesses currently externalise the cost of natural resources, creating a distorted picture of financial performance and business value. It can be demonstrated that many of the ‘services’ provided by the environment and which are essential for long term viability, are not factored into mainstream financial reporting.
The pressure on business to correct this distortion through True Cost Accounting is growing—a system in which the monetary value of natural resources such as water, timber and fossil fuels are included as costs that are reflected in the bottom line.
If True Cost Accounting is accepted as a normal business tool, and businesses pay for their use of natural resources, market dynamics will drive businesses to reduce their dependency in order to survive.
Production at Freeranger Eggs is aimed at sustainability and we believe we are well placed to meet an uncertain future – although there are bound to be problems from time to time with feed shortages and cost increases.
Labels:
climate change,
egg farms,
greenhouse gas emissions
Wednesday, June 05, 2013
Vic Government releases food safety requirements for egg farmers
Many egg producers thumb their noses at food safety issues because they don't understand (or don't care) about the implications for consumers or for their businesses.
At last, here in Victoria the Government has sent out its requirements for meeting the new national standards for egg production which came into effect on November 26 last year. It gives producers until November 26 2014 to comply with egg stamping regulations!
Which means that for more than another year, many Victorian consumers will continue to have no idea where the eggs they buy actually originate. There have been many examples of substitution, with eggs brought in from other farms using different production systems - some of them interstate. These eggs are packed and marketed as being produced on a particular farm, to specific standards.
At least when stamping each egg with a unique farm identification code, consumers may be able to tell who is cheating. But until November next year the con merchants will have a ball.
Once the Department of Primary Industries has issued us with a code to put on our eggs, we intend to buy the necessary equipment and start stamping Freeranger Eggs even though we don't have to for almost 18 months.
It makes sense to us that consumers should be able to tell the source of the eggs they buy.
At Freeranger Eggs we've had a fully operation HACCP-based Quality Assurance and Food Safety Program in place for several years, so we don't have to do anything more apart from stamping the eggs.
One dumb thing in the new regulations is that eggs can be stamped on the farm where they are laid - or at the grading floor. (This means that smart operators of the grading floor can put on any identifier they like. What a loophole!)
Thursday, May 30, 2013
24 egg packs at Frankston Farmers Market
We will be at the Frankston Farmers' Market this Saturday with a full range of eggs from 500 gram ten packs to 950 gram Megga Eggs. But we will have a new deal on offer.
New 24 egg cartons are available now, so we will be selling 24 packs of 65 gram eggs at $14.50 - a 50 cent saving on buying two 12 cartons.
We will see how it goes and we may extend the range in 24 packs!
New 24 egg cartons are available now, so we will be selling 24 packs of 65 gram eggs at $14.50 - a 50 cent saving on buying two 12 cartons.
We will see how it goes and we may extend the range in 24 packs!
Monday, May 27, 2013
Accreditation, egg substitution and deception
Egg substitution has been rife for
years but probably first came to general notice in Victoria during
2007 with a high profile case when a company was fined for labelling
eggs as organic when they were from conventional farms.
In 2012, a NSW barn egg farm was fined
for packaging its eggs as free range and a South Australian egg
seller was fined for putting cage eggs in free range cartons.
Also in 2012. An egg farm in WA was
caught with a huge overstocking rate which breached its planning
conditions. This farm was accredited by a national egg quality scheme but despite annual
audits which required compliance with planning conditions the farm
remained accredited. It's accreditation was only withdrawn once the
breaches became public and legal proceedings began.
In Victoria in 2012 inspection and
audit processes revealed that a farm which sold eggs to a major
supermarket was packing and selling non-accredited eggs from dubious
sources and that colouring additives were being used in poultry feed
– breaching particular standards.
Labels can also be misleading, with
pictures of hens frolicking on green pasture, which frequently
doesn't resemble conditions on the farm.
A questionable 'organic' accreditation
body also exists in Victoria which is not recognised by mainstream
organic bodies and which does not have a credible inspection process
– but it claims that the products which members sell are certified
organic. AQIS, which registers organic certification bodies in
Australia, is apparently only involved with export industries – so
it has no jurisdiction over domestic 'organic' claims.
Accreditation means different things to
different people. Consumers rightly expect it to convey a message of
credibility about a particular product, but to many businesses it's
simply a marketing tool designed to allow them to make claims which
increase their profits.
Similarly, a logo can be a valuable
asset if it is trusted by consumers. But it's value can be destroyed
if it is shown to be meaningless. Any accreditation program is only
as good as the willingness of the accreditation body to maintain its
standards and defend its logo.
That is why it is so disappointing that
standards are ignored by accreditation bodies. Even using things like
egg yolk colourings should be disclosed to consumers. Everyone
expects cage farms to use them to enhance yolk colour but it is not necessary on a genuine free range farm with low stocking
densities and plenty of green feed. It needlessly puts consumers at risk.
To maintain ethical standards and
credibility, all certification bodies need to defend their standards
and take action against members who break the rules.
The Australian Competition and Consumer
Commission has sent out notices to many egg producers, requiring them
to justify the claims made on their packaging – claims such as
'free range'.
Hopefully this will start a 'clean-up'
process.
Labels:
colouring additives,
egg substiution,
Egg yolk colour,
organic
Friday, May 24, 2013
Freeranger on The Living Room
Here's a link to a preview of part of tonight's The Living Room show on Channel 10. Celebrity chef Miguel Maestre cooks Green Eggs and Ham - after reading the Dr Seuss book to our chooks!
https://www.facebook.com/FreerangerEggs#!/photo.php?v=450039318424907&set=vb.198962956865879&type=2&theater
https://www.facebook.com/FreerangerEggs#!/photo.php?v=450039318424907&set=vb.198962956865879&type=2&theater
Labels:
Freeranger Eggs,
Green Eggs and Ham,
The Living Room
Thursday, May 23, 2013
What's in a name ?
It's not just the hidden use of colouring additives by many egg producers that is causing waves in the industry, nor the arguments about densities and beak trimming hens on 'free range' farms. Now one of Australia's largest producers is coming under scrutiny in South Australia for its labelling.
Apparently it is using the name 'Barossa' on eggs which may not produced in that state.
Here's an article from today's Adelaide Advertiser:
A VICTORIAN firm selling eggs under the name Barossa Ridge Farms is being investigated by the state consumer watchdog for potentially breaching labelling laws.
The eggs are being sold in the Barossa Valley but consumers are concerned they may not originate in the world-famous wine region.
Clever marketing - including a large picture of vines on the carton lid - indicates that the eggs are produced in the Barossa but the fine print shows that might not be true.
These eggs are sold by Melbourne-based Farm Pride Foods - formerly the Victorian Egg Marketing Board - and labelled in the fine print as product of Australia.
A carton of the eggs was bought by a shopper at a deli in Tanunda last week and given to Opposition agriculture spokesman David Ridgway over concerns the labelling is misleading.
"I have spoken to the company which said it can't guarantee the eggs are from the Barossa or even from SA," Mr Ridgway said.
He has invited the public to contact him with other misleading advertising examples in order to name and shame offending companies on his website.
And if the Opposition is elected to government next year, he pledged to review labelling laws to provide better protection for South Australian consumers.
Minister for Consumer and Business Services John Rau said he was "outraged" by the labelling.
"I've referred this matter to Consumer and Business Services - as a regulator of Australian Consumer Law - to see whether or not this is an example of misleading or deceptive food labelling," he said yesterday.
The Barossa branch of Regional Development Australia said the misleading use of the region's name to market products is an "issue that has been raised before".
"When you have a brand which comes with as much value as the Barossa Valley, there always will be people looking to exploit it," the Barossa branch chief executive Anne Moroney said.
Barossa Food - representing local food producers - said "with Barossa eggs you would expect the chooks to come from the Barossa Valley".
"It is hoodwinking consumers because they may not recognise the eggs are not from the Barossa," Barossa Food committee member Jan Angus said. "I implore the government to ... help us."
Apparently it is using the name 'Barossa' on eggs which may not produced in that state.
Here's an article from today's Adelaide Advertiser:
A VICTORIAN firm selling eggs under the name Barossa Ridge Farms is being investigated by the state consumer watchdog for potentially breaching labelling laws.
The eggs are being sold in the Barossa Valley but consumers are concerned they may not originate in the world-famous wine region.
Clever marketing - including a large picture of vines on the carton lid - indicates that the eggs are produced in the Barossa but the fine print shows that might not be true.
These eggs are sold by Melbourne-based Farm Pride Foods - formerly the Victorian Egg Marketing Board - and labelled in the fine print as product of Australia.
A carton of the eggs was bought by a shopper at a deli in Tanunda last week and given to Opposition agriculture spokesman David Ridgway over concerns the labelling is misleading.
"I have spoken to the company which said it can't guarantee the eggs are from the Barossa or even from SA," Mr Ridgway said.
And if the Opposition is elected to government next year, he pledged to review labelling laws to provide better protection for South Australian consumers.
Minister for Consumer and Business Services John Rau said he was "outraged" by the labelling.
"I've referred this matter to Consumer and Business Services - as a regulator of Australian Consumer Law - to see whether or not this is an example of misleading or deceptive food labelling," he said yesterday.
The Barossa branch of Regional Development Australia said the misleading use of the region's name to market products is an "issue that has been raised before".
"When you have a brand which comes with as much value as the Barossa Valley, there always will be people looking to exploit it," the Barossa branch chief executive Anne Moroney said.
Barossa Food - representing local food producers - said "with Barossa eggs you would expect the chooks to come from the Barossa Valley".
"It is hoodwinking consumers because they may not recognise the eggs are not from the Barossa," Barossa Food committee member Jan Angus said. "I implore the government to ... help us."
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Freeranger Eggs on The Living Room
The Freeranger Egg farm will feature on the Channel 10 TV show 'The Living Room' next Friday (May 24 at 7.30). It will probably only be four minutes or so, but celebrity chef Miguel Maestre and the film crew were on the Freeranger farm in February for around eight hours.
They filmed in several of our paddocks and Miguel helped to collect eggs before cooking superb scrambled eggs - Green Eggs and Ham - after reading the Dr Seuss book to the chooks! They certainly enjoyed it as they are always happy in interact with people.
We had to keep some of Maremmas out of the way because they don't like anyone messing around with their hens.
It was great to meet the production crew, and yes Miguel is just as full-on in person as he is on screen.
They filmed in several of our paddocks and Miguel helped to collect eggs before cooking superb scrambled eggs - Green Eggs and Ham - after reading the Dr Seuss book to the chooks! They certainly enjoyed it as they are always happy in interact with people.
We had to keep some of Maremmas out of the way because they don't like anyone messing around with their hens.
It was great to meet the production crew, and yes Miguel is just as full-on in person as he is on screen.
Labels:
free range eggs,
Freeranger Eggs,
The Living Room
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
Problems with colouring in eggs
As this is Food Allergy Awareness Week in Australia, it is worth looking at the widespread use of colouring additives. All major egg
producers and many small ones - even those which claim to be free
range and organic - use colouring additives in the feed they give
their hens. Some members of the Free Range Farmers
Association have been deliberately using those additives for more
than a year – even though the use of manufactured colourings is a
clear breach of the Association's standards.
The use of those additives is
completely unnecessary in a free range flock, as hens running on
quality pasture and at low stocking densities will obtain enough
carotenoids from the green feed in the paddock to maintain good yolk
colour. The colour will vary – depending on the time of year and
what each hen has been eating – but many egg producers want to con
consumers by using additives to provide consistent, bright yolk
colour.Many of those additives are synthetic - adding to the chemical cocktail mix in food. But even those which are claimed to be 'natural' are manufactured in factories – often in China. What the manufacturers mean by using the word 'natural' is that the additives may be derived from natural products but are processed and concentrated into a powder or liquid.
Three of the most widely used egg yolk pigmenters are:
Canthaxanin or Canthaxanthin which appears to be an unsafe additive. It can cause diarrhoea, nausea, stomach cramps, dry and itchy skin, hives, orange or red body secretions, and other side effects.
Do not use canthaxanthin if you experience breathing problems; tightness in the chest; swelling of the mouth, tongue or throat; a skin rash or hives; you are pregnant or breast-feeding or you are allergic to vitamin A or carotenoids.
Capsicum Allergic reactions to capsicum may occur. Stop eating eggs with capsicum-based colouring and seek emergency medical attention if you experience symptoms of a serious allergic reaction including difficulty breathing; closing of the throat; swelling of the lips, tongue, or face; or hives.
Other less serious side effects have also been reported. Talk to your doctor, pharmacist, or health care provider if you experience upset stomach; heartburn; diarrhoea; migraine attacks or burning sensation in the mouth or throat.
Use of Capsicum is not recommended if you are pregnant. If you are or will be breast-feeding while eating food containing Capsicum, check with your doctor or pharmacist to discuss the risks to your baby.
Capsicum colourings can bring on anaphylactic shock. See details from the University of Maryland:
http://www.umm.edu/altmed/articles/anaphylaxis-000008.htm
Marigold Some people experience breathing problems, tightness in the chest, swelling of the mouth, tongue or throat. A skin rash or hives may occur.
From
the Auckland Allergy Clinic
Article
written: September 2001
Salicylate
sensitivity is the body’s inability to handle more than a certain
amount of salicylates at any one time. A salicylate sensitive person
may have difficulty tolerating certain fruits or vegetables.
What
are salicylates?
Salicylate
is a natural chemical made by many plants. It is chemically related
to aspirin, which is a derivative of salicylic acid. It is believed
the plant uses it as protection from insects, and they are everywhere
around us.
Although
natural salicylates are found in wholesome foods, some individuals
have difficulty tolerating even small amounts of them. The reaction
to a natural salicylate can be as severe as that to a synthetic
additive if the person is highly sensitive. Some people are troubled
by only a very few, but some are troubled by all of them.
What
is salicylate sensitivity?
Some
adults and children have a low level of tolerance to salicylates and
may get symptoms that are dose-related. The tolerated amount varies
from one person to another. This is an example of food intolerance.
What
are some of the symptoms of Salicylate Intolerance?
•
Asthma
•
Nasal
Polyps
•
Sinusitis
•
Rhino
conjunctivitis
•
Stomach
aches and upsets
Foods
containing Salicylates
Salicylates
occur naturally in many fruits, and vegetables as a preservative, to
prevent rotting and protect against harmful bacteria and fungi. They
are stored in the bark, leaves, roots, and seeds of plants.
Salicylates are found naturally in many foods and its compounds are
used in many products.
All
fresh meat, fish, shellfish, poultry, eggs, dairy products, cereals,
bread are naturally low in salicylates
Foods
with very high Salicylate content include:
Vegetables:
Capsicum
Hot Peppers
|
Capsaicin Factsheet
http://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/Capsaicintech.pdf
A UK report on
The
Adverse Effects of Food Additives on Health, published
in the Journal of
Orthomolecular Medicine described surveys
on food intolerance which showed that as many as 2 in 10 people
believe that they react badly to certain foods or to their
constituents, whereas less than 2 in every 100 has been considered to
be the official figure.
However, a recently published report
indicates that small children are much more likely to react to
certain foods. Although the exact numbers are not known, surveys
suggest that one child in 10 may be affected in some wayOf the nearly 4000 different additives currently in use, over 3640 are used purely for cosmetic reasons and as colouring agents.
The continued reason for the use of additives is based
on the argument that they are present in foods on such a minute scale
that they must be harmless.
This argument may be almost acceptable regarding
additives with a reversible toxicological action. However, with
additives which have been found to be both mutagenic and
carcinogenic, neither the human nor animal body is able to detoxify.
Therefore even very minute doses of these additives, when consumed
continuously, will eventually result in an irreversible toxic burden,
resulting finally in cancer formation and/or in chromosomal and foetal
damage. This is unacceptable, particularly as the majority of these
dangerous agents belong to the food colouring group.
The full report is available here:
An allergy
is a hypersensitity disorder of the immune system. Allergic
reactions occur when a person's immune system reacts to normally
harmless substances in the environment. A substance that causes a
reaction is called an allergen. These reactions are acquired,
predictable, and rapid. Allergy is one of four forms of
hypersensitivity and is formally called type 1 hypersensitivity.
Allergic reactions are distinctive because of excessive activation of
certain white blood cells.
Mild
allergies like hay fever are very common in humans but allergies can
play a major role in conditions such as asthma. In some people,
severe allergies to environmental or dietary allergens may result in
life-threatening reactions called anaphylaxis.
Wednesday, May 08, 2013
Coles awards for big corporate egg producers
Here's an article from the Bendigo Advertiser.
Bears Lagoon (near Bendigo) chicken farm Novo Farm Pride has been announced as one of three overall winners of the Coles Brand Supplier of the Year.
It won the award with two other egg producers, Queensland’s Sunny Queen and New South Wales’ Pace Farm, because of its moves to sell cage-free eggs.
Novo Farm Pride opened another three state-of-the-art sheds in October last year, doubling the amount of birds at the operation to 180,000.
The company has worked with Coles to define the free-range standard for eggs.
"Free-range eggs have been growing double digits every year for the past five to 10 years, so through discussions with Coles we worked together to expand the farms capacity," national sales and marketing manager Ian Savenake said.
"We have been able to hold sessions and work with Coles to define the free-range standard and meet consumer demand for our welfare-friendly eggs.
"The award is recognition for the whole team from the farmers to people on the grading floor, to admin, to sales." Coles merchandise director John Durkan said the producers had shown leadership in the egg industry by making the move to produce cage-free eggs.
If these eggs were labelled as cage free there would be no issue with consumers or the free range sector of the egg industry. But they are labelled as free range which does not meet consumer expectations or the standards of legimate free range ergg farmers.
Bears Lagoon (near Bendigo) chicken farm Novo Farm Pride has been announced as one of three overall winners of the Coles Brand Supplier of the Year.
It won the award with two other egg producers, Queensland’s Sunny Queen and New South Wales’ Pace Farm, because of its moves to sell cage-free eggs.
Novo Farm Pride opened another three state-of-the-art sheds in October last year, doubling the amount of birds at the operation to 180,000.
The company has worked with Coles to define the free-range standard for eggs.
"Free-range eggs have been growing double digits every year for the past five to 10 years, so through discussions with Coles we worked together to expand the farms capacity," national sales and marketing manager Ian Savenake said.
"We have been able to hold sessions and work with Coles to define the free-range standard and meet consumer demand for our welfare-friendly eggs.
"The award is recognition for the whole team from the farmers to people on the grading floor, to admin, to sales." Coles merchandise director John Durkan said the producers had shown leadership in the egg industry by making the move to produce cage-free eggs.
If these eggs were labelled as cage free there would be no issue with consumers or the free range sector of the egg industry. But they are labelled as free range which does not meet consumer expectations or the standards of legimate free range ergg farmers.
Labels:
Coles,
Farm Pride Foods,
free range con,
free range eggs
Tuesday, May 07, 2013
Dead hens no health risk
The Shire of Gingin in WA says there are no health risks from an incident where 250
dead chickens spilled on to Gingin roads from a truck last week.
Gingin CEO Jeremy Edwards said the Shire had contacted the contractor who was transporting the chickens to a Moora facility.
He said the chickens were cleared from roads quickly.
"They were cleaned up by our operations crew and rangers and the company that owned the chickens also responded in a timely manner," he said.
Mr Edwards said the Shire had issued the contractor with an infringement notice for an unsecure load.
"About 250 chickens out of 12,000 being transported fell off," Mr Edwards said. The Shire and egg producer AAA Eggs will meet tomorrow for further mediation on a development proposal to build a free-range poultry farm for 300,000 chickens in a rural zoned area in Wanerie. The Shire refused the application but the State Administrative Tribunal is reviewing the plan.
Hmmm!!!!!!!
Gingin CEO Jeremy Edwards said the Shire had contacted the contractor who was transporting the chickens to a Moora facility.
He said the chickens were cleared from roads quickly.
"They were cleaned up by our operations crew and rangers and the company that owned the chickens also responded in a timely manner," he said.
Mr Edwards said the Shire had issued the contractor with an infringement notice for an unsecure load.
"About 250 chickens out of 12,000 being transported fell off," Mr Edwards said. The Shire and egg producer AAA Eggs will meet tomorrow for further mediation on a development proposal to build a free-range poultry farm for 300,000 chickens in a rural zoned area in Wanerie. The Shire refused the application but the State Administrative Tribunal is reviewing the plan.
Hmmm!!!!!!!
Wednesday, May 01, 2013
Egg Farm Biosecurity
Work on an Egg Farm Biosecurity Manual is nearing completion, according to Duncan Rowland, Executive Manager Biosecurity Services at Animal Health Australia.
“Over the past few months AHA has been working with its industry members to update their on-farm biosecurity manuals. Recent industry endorsed publications include a Farm Biosecurity Manual for the Duck Meat Industry; Grazing Industries Biosecurity Reference Manual (covering cattle, sheep, goats and alpaca) and a Pork Biosecurity Reference Manual,” Dr Rowland said.
We wonder who he has been talking to in the egg industry?
“Over the past few months AHA has been working with its industry members to update their on-farm biosecurity manuals. Recent industry endorsed publications include a Farm Biosecurity Manual for the Duck Meat Industry; Grazing Industries Biosecurity Reference Manual (covering cattle, sheep, goats and alpaca) and a Pork Biosecurity Reference Manual,” Dr Rowland said.
We wonder who he has been talking to in the egg industry?
Court action in Europe over cages
There are still some major problems in Europe following the ban on
unenriched cages for the egg industry.
Greece and Italy in particular have caused headaches for the European Commission and the behaviour of those countries in ignoring the ban has been handed to the European Court of Justice.
Following the compliance deadline, there were many complaints from businesses which complied with the new regulations about those countries that failed to replace their conventional battery cages.
Compassion in World Farming reports that Italy and Greece have 20 million hens confined in barren battery cased, despite the 10 year period given for the January 2012 deadline. This has clearly resulted in unfair competition throughout Europe.
The European Commission is taking the two countries to the Court of Justice over their failure to implement Directive 1999/74/EC banning “un-enriched cages.”
Greece and Italy in particular have caused headaches for the European Commission and the behaviour of those countries in ignoring the ban has been handed to the European Court of Justice.
Following the compliance deadline, there were many complaints from businesses which complied with the new regulations about those countries that failed to replace their conventional battery cages.
Compassion in World Farming reports that Italy and Greece have 20 million hens confined in barren battery cased, despite the 10 year period given for the January 2012 deadline. This has clearly resulted in unfair competition throughout Europe.
The European Commission is taking the two countries to the Court of Justice over their failure to implement Directive 1999/74/EC banning “un-enriched cages.”
Labels:
cage eggs,
enriched cages,
European egg standards
Thursday, April 11, 2013
New bird flu hard to detect
An outbreak the H7N9 strain of avian influenza in China has seen the introduction of some strong biosecurity measures there and in some other countries. The United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organisation says that unlike other bird flu strains, this new virus is hard to detect in poultry because the novel virus causes few signs of disease in animals.
"Unlike H5N1, where chickens were dying on a large scale, with this virus we don't have a red flag that immediately signals an infection. This means farmers may not be aware that virus is circulating in their flock. Biosecurity and hygiene measures will help people protect themselves from virus circulating in seemingly healthy birds or other animals," said Juan Lubroth, Food and Agriculture Organization chief veterinary officer.
Gold Coast Health has put emergency department doctors and GPs on alert for symptoms of the bird flu in patients who have been to China.
There are 20 flights a week between the Gold Coast and China and the Federal Government has warned that the H7N9 virus, which has so far killed nine of the 28 people it has infected in China, has a higher likelihood of spreading because the virus has already infected humans through direct contact with poultry.
"Unlike H5N1, where chickens were dying on a large scale, with this virus we don't have a red flag that immediately signals an infection. This means farmers may not be aware that virus is circulating in their flock. Biosecurity and hygiene measures will help people protect themselves from virus circulating in seemingly healthy birds or other animals," said Juan Lubroth, Food and Agriculture Organization chief veterinary officer.
Gold Coast Health has put emergency department doctors and GPs on alert for symptoms of the bird flu in patients who have been to China.
There are 20 flights a week between the Gold Coast and China and the Federal Government has warned that the H7N9 virus, which has so far killed nine of the 28 people it has infected in China, has a higher likelihood of spreading because the virus has already infected humans through direct contact with poultry.
Saturday, April 06, 2013
UK producers may be selling up
There are indications that free range egg producers in the UK may be selling up and getting out of the industry.
After a decade of consistent growth, the last two years have been very difficult for the free range egg sector.
Poor prices for eggs and soaring feed costs have exerted fierce financial pressure on free range producers, and it would appear that some producers have had enough.
If the Australian Egg Corporation had succeeded with its push for outdoor stocking densities of 20,000 hens per hectare to be classified as free range, many family farms in Australia would have been destroyed. If Coles gets acceptance for its 10,000 per hectare density the same thing may happen.
More details about the situation in the UK at:
http://www.farminguk.com/news/Confusion-as-producers-ponder-exit-or-expansion-plans_25301.html
After a decade of consistent growth, the last two years have been very difficult for the free range egg sector.
Poor prices for eggs and soaring feed costs have exerted fierce financial pressure on free range producers, and it would appear that some producers have had enough.
If the Australian Egg Corporation had succeeded with its push for outdoor stocking densities of 20,000 hens per hectare to be classified as free range, many family farms in Australia would have been destroyed. If Coles gets acceptance for its 10,000 per hectare density the same thing may happen.
More details about the situation in the UK at:
http://www.farminguk.com/news/Confusion-as-producers-ponder-exit-or-expansion-plans_25301.html
Friday, April 05, 2013
ACCC gets tough
Many 'free range' egg
producers in Australia are running for cover now that the ACCC has begun a campaign to clean up the industry.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has issued Substantiation Notices under Consumer Law to a cross section of the egg industry in Australia. The operators who have received the notices will have to justify the claims made on their packaging and promotional material - many do not even come close to meeting the standards required by the Model Code of Practice for the Welfare of Animals - Domestic Poultry.
The Australian Egg Corporation Ltd
is trying to cover its backside as the dodgy operators are claiming they have only
done what AECL told them was OK.
Should
be an interesting few months. It might even help to fix up some of the certification and
accreditation bodies which have very slack inspection standards (if they bother to inspect at all).
Labels:
ACCC,
AECL,
Deceptive labelling,
Egg producers,
free range con,
free range eggs
Monday, April 01, 2013
Drones looking at farms
Animal Liberation in NSW is about to
deploy surveillance drones to look for evidence of animal cruelty on
private property - including flying over free range egg farms, sheep
and cattle farms.
It's likely that the low flying cameras will anger many farmers not only because of the intrusion on their privacy, but because of the potential to frighten and injure stock.
The issue has been brought to the attention of the Australian Privacy Commissioner, Timothy Pilgrim, who said that using the drones was "potentially intrusive”.
It's likely that the low flying cameras will anger many farmers not only because of the intrusion on their privacy, but because of the potential to frighten and injure stock.
It is said that the drones will be
flown at a height above 10 metres from the ground – and that is
claimed to be legal.
Simple surveillance of farms to
verify production claims (such as free range egg farming) is
currently undertaken by using Google Earth. Clear images are
available of every farm and the drones are probably unnecessary.The issue has been brought to the attention of the Australian Privacy Commissioner, Timothy Pilgrim, who said that using the drones was "potentially intrusive”.
Monday, March 25, 2013
Worming free range hens
A drop in egg production or
increased mortality in a flock is a clear indication of a farm
management problem affecting bird health. Often the first thought is
a disease such as Infectious Bronchitis, but frequently the problem
can be intestinal worms.
A build up of worm eggs on free range paddocks which have been in operation for a number of years can be very significant, and the cycle needs to be broken by good paddock rotation, including resting paddocks for several months before introducing a new flock..
Worm infestations have been thought to be rather seasonal but in temperate parts of Australia, worms present a potential year round problem.
Depending on the type of intestinal worms, the bird's gut can be severely damaged, restricting egg production, causing loss of body weight and death.
Monitoring bird health is important. You need to be aware of signs of listlessness in the hens and regular inspection of droppings is important. If you suspect a problem, talk to your vet.
Understand the worm risk on your farm and include a worm monitoring and control strategy in your animal health plan.
For anyone who wants to see post mortem training videos, have a look at:
A build up of worm eggs on free range paddocks which have been in operation for a number of years can be very significant, and the cycle needs to be broken by good paddock rotation, including resting paddocks for several months before introducing a new flock..
Worm infestations have been thought to be rather seasonal but in temperate parts of Australia, worms present a potential year round problem.
Depending on the type of intestinal worms, the bird's gut can be severely damaged, restricting egg production, causing loss of body weight and death.
There is likely to be poor
feed conversion and affected birds may look unhealthy, with runny
manure and pale or drooping combs
Affected hens are at risk of egg peritonitis and secondary gut problems involving bacterial infections. In cases involving many birds in the flock, production can be hit very severely as the hens are unable to utilise all of the nutrients in their feed.. Egg quality is likely to decline, particularly yolk colour with a reduction in egg size as well as loss of shell colour and strength.
There is also an increased risk of vent pecking which may lead to cannibalism.
Affected hens are at risk of egg peritonitis and secondary gut problems involving bacterial infections. In cases involving many birds in the flock, production can be hit very severely as the hens are unable to utilise all of the nutrients in their feed.. Egg quality is likely to decline, particularly yolk colour with a reduction in egg size as well as loss of shell colour and strength.
There is also an increased risk of vent pecking which may lead to cannibalism.
The diet you use needs to be
a well balanced ration, especially with an adequate supply of
vitamins A and the B complex. A deficiency in these has been shown to
increase susceptibility to parasitism.
Three main types of worms cause problems in free range hens. Roundworms and Hairworms affect the duodenum and small intestine, Hetarakis worms affect the caeca.
Roundworms (Ascaridia galli)
These are the largest and most common of the chicken intestinal worms and can completely block the intestines. Worms are white with adults up to 2 inches long which can be easily seen in droppings.
Hairworms (Capillaria)
Hairworms are small and just visible. These worms are capable of causing severe damage to the intestine even in small numbers. Hairworm infection can be identified by examining faecal material under the microscope or looking at intestinal material from birds submitted for post mortem.
Caecal worms (Hetarakis gallinarum)
Hetarakis worms spend most of their time in the caeca. The worms themselves often cause no obvious problem but their significance is that they can carry another parasite (Histomonas) into the bird. Histomonas is the cause of Blackhead which can cause deaths in free range flocks.
Chickens become infected with worms by picking up worm eggs from their surroundings. This may be from within the shed or from soil, grass or faecal material on the range. Worm eggs are resistant to disinfectants and the normal cleaning and disinfection programme used in poultry sheds between flocks does not remove all worm eggs. A new flock of pullets may be exposed to worm eggs as soon as they arrive, both in the shed and out on the pasture.
Three main types of worms cause problems in free range hens. Roundworms and Hairworms affect the duodenum and small intestine, Hetarakis worms affect the caeca.
Roundworms (Ascaridia galli)
These are the largest and most common of the chicken intestinal worms and can completely block the intestines. Worms are white with adults up to 2 inches long which can be easily seen in droppings.
Hairworms (Capillaria)
Hairworms are small and just visible. These worms are capable of causing severe damage to the intestine even in small numbers. Hairworm infection can be identified by examining faecal material under the microscope or looking at intestinal material from birds submitted for post mortem.
Caecal worms (Hetarakis gallinarum)
Hetarakis worms spend most of their time in the caeca. The worms themselves often cause no obvious problem but their significance is that they can carry another parasite (Histomonas) into the bird. Histomonas is the cause of Blackhead which can cause deaths in free range flocks.
Chickens become infected with worms by picking up worm eggs from their surroundings. This may be from within the shed or from soil, grass or faecal material on the range. Worm eggs are resistant to disinfectants and the normal cleaning and disinfection programme used in poultry sheds between flocks does not remove all worm eggs. A new flock of pullets may be exposed to worm eggs as soon as they arrive, both in the shed and out on the pasture.
Monitoring bird health is important. You need to be aware of signs of listlessness in the hens and regular inspection of droppings is important. If you suspect a problem, talk to your vet.
It is useful to examine the
gut of any dead birds (either do it yourself if you have an idea
what you are looking for or ask your vet to do a post mortem).
Good paddock rotation, with lengthy rest periods between flocks is the most effective worm control program but worming is also important. If you don't want to use chemicals, cider vinegar in the water, access to plants which are vermifuges (for exmple Wormwood or Garlic) and mixing diatomaceous earth in feed can help to control internal worm infestations.
The area closest to a fixed shed is always a high risk area for build up of worms and other pathogens, which is one reason for the populartity of mobile chicken sheds.
The UV rays in sunlight are the best killer of worm eggs.
Good paddock rotation, with lengthy rest periods between flocks is the most effective worm control program but worming is also important. If you don't want to use chemicals, cider vinegar in the water, access to plants which are vermifuges (for exmple Wormwood or Garlic) and mixing diatomaceous earth in feed can help to control internal worm infestations.
The area closest to a fixed shed is always a high risk area for build up of worms and other pathogens, which is one reason for the populartity of mobile chicken sheds.
The UV rays in sunlight are the best killer of worm eggs.
Understand the worm risk on your farm and include a worm monitoring and control strategy in your animal health plan.
For anyone who wants to see post mortem training videos, have a look at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTJ-FyPOpLU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQUZ48pGa5g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_Fob6vNe6M
Friday, March 22, 2013
Beak trimming ban in UK
A ban on beak trimming free range hens in the United Kingdom was due to come into force in 2011 but was put off on the advice of the Farm Animal Welfare Council because of concerns about feather pecking and cannibalism. The British Government has warned that it intends to introduce the ban in 2016.
Considerable work on husbandry methods which can be adopted to control feather pecking and cannib...alism has been carried out by the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna.
Trials have also been underway for a couple of years by Professor Christine Nicol and her team at the University of Bristol. She has said that it is possible to manage hens with intact beaks in commercial flocks without problems.
Here in Australia, there are many commercial free range farms operating without the need to beak trim their hens. As long as the chickens are not over-crowded and have plenty of pasture, there is seldom a problem with injurious feather pecking.
Considerable work on husbandry methods which can be adopted to control feather pecking and cannib...alism has been carried out by the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna.
Trials have also been underway for a couple of years by Professor Christine Nicol and her team at the University of Bristol. She has said that it is possible to manage hens with intact beaks in commercial flocks without problems.
Here in Australia, there are many commercial free range farms operating without the need to beak trim their hens. As long as the chickens are not over-crowded and have plenty of pasture, there is seldom a problem with injurious feather pecking.
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Approval for massive 'free range' farm in WA
The Shire of Gingin in WA has approved a plan for a 'free range' poultry farm with 360,000 birds at
Wanerie, west of Gingin.
In February Gingin council approved a proposal from AAA Eggs to establish the massive egg farm, subject to strict conditions, including annual odour reports .
The 200ha site is 37km northeast of Gingin townsite.
The council considered the proposal a number of times and requested more information, before referring the case to the State Administrative Tribunal.
Most of the local concerns were about amenity, in particular odour control. Annual odour reporting and the establishment of a community stakeholder group are included in the permit conditions.
AAA is WA's biggest egg producer and already has a production facility in Gingin Shire.
In February Gingin council approved a proposal from AAA Eggs to establish the massive egg farm, subject to strict conditions, including annual odour reports .
The 200ha site is 37km northeast of Gingin townsite.
The council considered the proposal a number of times and requested more information, before referring the case to the State Administrative Tribunal.
Most of the local concerns were about amenity, in particular odour control. Annual odour reporting and the establishment of a community stakeholder group are included in the permit conditions.
AAA is WA's biggest egg producer and already has a production facility in Gingin Shire.
Tuesday, March 05, 2013
Coles' standard unlikely to get through
The new Coles' free range standard of 10,000 hens per hectare may follow the same fate as the AECL's pathetic attempt to launch its 20,000 per hectare standard. This is from today's The Age:
Supermarket Coles’ new standard for freerange eggs looks set to run foul of the national consumer watchdog with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission declaring that eggs produced at intensive farms do not deserve the label "free range’’.
While not commenting directly on Coles whose new free-range standard is 10,000 hens per hectare, almost a seven-fold reduction in space from the voluntary guidelines ACCC commissioner Sarah Court said the watchdog believed 10,000 hens per hectare was not consistent with consumers’ understanding of free range.
Ms Court said the commission was very concerned "the egg industry was trying to redefine free range to increase their own profitability’’ without regard to consumers’ views. The ACCC is concerned about "the redefinition of what is meant by free range by industry to suit itself, and the fact that the redefinition has the very real potential of misleading consumers,’’ she said.
The egg industry is spending millions of dollars renovating caged-hen facilities and building new state-of-the-art intensive freerange systems to meet Coles’ new standard.
Industry sources expect Woolworths and Aldi will follow Coles’ standard if it is accepted by the community and regulators such as the ACCC leading to a redefinition of free range in Australia.
Coles says its standard which allows free-range farmers to run sheds of 30,000 hens is the only way to deliver affordable eggs to consumers. The supermarket chain says it is drawing a line in the sand after the industry admitted it had been running freerange hens at densities of 50,000.
In response to the ACCC’s comments, Coles spokesman Jim Cooper said: Our stocking density is far better than most of Australia’s free-range egg production, which typically comes from farms running at double or even triple the stocking density that Coles allows.’’
Fairfax Media revealed on Monday that Animals Australia and the RSPCA, previously supportive of Coles’ efforts to improve its egg range had questioned whether eggs from intensive free-range systems could be called free range.
Monash economics professor and former ACCC member Stephen King said without a legally enforceable free-range code, Coles had done nothing wrong. But the ambiguity over free range was a government failure’’.
We certainly agree that the current fiasco is a government failure which demonstrates that 'truth in labelling' legislation must be a high priority. We also hope that the ACCC will launch some prosecutions against egg producers who have been scamming their customers for years.
The end game for Coles is easy. Simply call their high density system 'cage free' as they state in their advertising. Don't try to con consumers that this is 'free range'.
Supermarket Coles’ new standard for freerange eggs looks set to run foul of the national consumer watchdog with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission declaring that eggs produced at intensive farms do not deserve the label "free range’’.
While not commenting directly on Coles whose new free-range standard is 10,000 hens per hectare, almost a seven-fold reduction in space from the voluntary guidelines ACCC commissioner Sarah Court said the watchdog believed 10,000 hens per hectare was not consistent with consumers’ understanding of free range.
Ms Court said the commission was very concerned "the egg industry was trying to redefine free range to increase their own profitability’’ without regard to consumers’ views. The ACCC is concerned about "the redefinition of what is meant by free range by industry to suit itself, and the fact that the redefinition has the very real potential of misleading consumers,’’ she said.
The egg industry is spending millions of dollars renovating caged-hen facilities and building new state-of-the-art intensive freerange systems to meet Coles’ new standard.
Industry sources expect Woolworths and Aldi will follow Coles’ standard if it is accepted by the community and regulators such as the ACCC leading to a redefinition of free range in Australia.
Coles says its standard which allows free-range farmers to run sheds of 30,000 hens is the only way to deliver affordable eggs to consumers. The supermarket chain says it is drawing a line in the sand after the industry admitted it had been running freerange hens at densities of 50,000.
In response to the ACCC’s comments, Coles spokesman Jim Cooper said: Our stocking density is far better than most of Australia’s free-range egg production, which typically comes from farms running at double or even triple the stocking density that Coles allows.’’
Fairfax Media revealed on Monday that Animals Australia and the RSPCA, previously supportive of Coles’ efforts to improve its egg range had questioned whether eggs from intensive free-range systems could be called free range.
Monash economics professor and former ACCC member Stephen King said without a legally enforceable free-range code, Coles had done nothing wrong. But the ambiguity over free range was a government failure’’.
We certainly agree that the current fiasco is a government failure which demonstrates that 'truth in labelling' legislation must be a high priority. We also hope that the ACCC will launch some prosecutions against egg producers who have been scamming their customers for years.
The end game for Coles is easy. Simply call their high density system 'cage free' as they state in their advertising. Don't try to con consumers that this is 'free range'.
Monday, March 04, 2013
The Coles 'free range' standard under scrutiny
The Age and other Fairfax paper ran a couple of articles today about the new Coles 'free range' standard and here's a video clip on the Fairfax site.
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/coles-sets-its-own-squeezier-standard-20130303-2fefw.html
Tell us what you think!
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/coles-sets-its-own-squeezier-standard-20130303-2fefw.html
Tell us what you think!
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Running on eggshells and used cooking oil
There's an interesting article in the latest issue of the Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering explaining the 'development
of eggshell derived catalyst for transesterification of used cooking
oil for biodiesel production'.
One major drawback that prevents commercialization of biodiesel is the high cost of vegetable oil feedstock. In this work, used cooking oil, which is far cheaper than fresh vegetable oil, is used as an alternative raw material. Prior to transesterification reaction, esterification was conducted and catalyzed homogeneously to eliminate free fatty acid. Heterogeneous catalyst derived from cheap and easily obtained egg-shell (industrial waste) was used for transesterification reaction. A 100% ester yield was obtained at the optimized reaction conditions.
What a great use for eggshells.
One major drawback that prevents commercialization of biodiesel is the high cost of vegetable oil feedstock. In this work, used cooking oil, which is far cheaper than fresh vegetable oil, is used as an alternative raw material. Prior to transesterification reaction, esterification was conducted and catalyzed homogeneously to eliminate free fatty acid. Heterogeneous catalyst derived from cheap and easily obtained egg-shell (industrial waste) was used for transesterification reaction. A 100% ester yield was obtained at the optimized reaction conditions.
What a great use for eggshells.
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Study into Newcastle Disease
Research into Newcastle Disease, which is a particularly nasty disease for chickens is being undertaken through a project of the Poultry Co-operative Research Centre.
The severity of the clinical signs of ND is influenced by the strain of virus and the age, condition and species of the bird. Clinical signs in poultry range from a mild, almost inapparent respiratory disease to a very severe depression, drop in egg production, increased respiration, profuse diarrhoea followed by collapse, or long-term nervous signs (such as twisted necks) if the birds survive. Death rate can be up to 100 per cent in severe (virulent) forms of the disease. The incubation period is usually 5 – 6 days, but can vary from 2 – 15 days.
Strains of ND virus that cause no disease, known as avirulent, low virulence or lentigenic strains, are common in Australian poultry flocks.
Direct sunlight destroys the virus in about 30 minutes.
More details on the CRC website at http://www.poultryhub.org/2013/02/pathogenicity-of-newcastle-disease/
The severity of the clinical signs of ND is influenced by the strain of virus and the age, condition and species of the bird. Clinical signs in poultry range from a mild, almost inapparent respiratory disease to a very severe depression, drop in egg production, increased respiration, profuse diarrhoea followed by collapse, or long-term nervous signs (such as twisted necks) if the birds survive. Death rate can be up to 100 per cent in severe (virulent) forms of the disease. The incubation period is usually 5 – 6 days, but can vary from 2 – 15 days.
Strains of ND virus that cause no disease, known as avirulent, low virulence or lentigenic strains, are common in Australian poultry flocks.
Direct sunlight destroys the virus in about 30 minutes.
More details on the CRC website at http://www.poultryhub.org/2013/02/pathogenicity-of-newcastle-disease/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








